Larry, haven't managed to look at that patch... But stuffed for time just now - just about to head off for the weekend. I'm hoping to spend a bit of time on this on Tuesday! So, i'll see how things have progressed then.
L. Larry Rosenman writes: > --On Friday, August 08, 2003 11:53:34 +0100 Lee Kindness > > I've not been keeping up with the thread re who has what version of > > getpwuid_r... But just to clarify things the "right" version is: > > > > int getpwuid_r(uid_t uid, struct passwd *pwd, char *buffer, > > size_t bufsize, struct passwd **result); > > > > documented at: > > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getpwuid.html > > > > My email to Bruce which he tacked onto his reply is a good summary of > > the current problems with the thread stuff. > Ok. Lee: Did you see the patch I posted? Can you help on the configure > test(s) > needed to set HAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R? > > I **THINK** I did the patch right to handle it if it's set. I forced it > for UnixWare > and it seems to work. > > Larry Rosenman writes: > > > --On Friday, August 08, 2003 02:10:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Actually, your getpwuid_r is the old, pre-POSIX format. The attached > > > > email has the configure tests. I was hoping we wouldn't need them, > > but > > it seems we may. > > > Err, SCO claims SUSv2, the Single Unix Specification Version 2. V3 > > > **JUST** came > > > out. > > > > > > I'll look at Lee's stuff. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
