Larry Rosenman wrote: > Don't start on the SCO issue. I submitted patches last weekend to fix the > UnixWare (and possibly other) issues. > > You said you were working on them, then I see the note that BETA2 was tagged > with INVALID shell code in src/templates/unixware, and > the per-platform threading stuff BROKEN on UnixWare. > > When I left for Las Vegas on 8/16, it was **WORKING**. You committed a > change > that BROKE it again. > > Yes, I'm pissed. > > UnixWare==SCO, but the Court fight has **NOTHING** to do with this issue. > > Does the PG core not care anymore about **QUALITY**? > > I'm NOT going to stand idly by as the SCO/IBM/RED HAT Legal issues are used > to > hurt PostgreSQL's quality. > > I'm NOT very pleased.
SCO's threading support in a beta release is about number 2000 on my list of priorities right now. It will work in final --- that's all I can promise. If that isn't good enough, find someone else who wants to do the work for you. I am avoiding fixing the SCO port because it would ugilify the other ports --- we need to discuss that, not ram in a fix just to get it working on one platform --- that is quality. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
