Patch applied as part of Christopher Browne's patch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 09:35, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> > > I made a patch to fix this, but in testing it I noticed that the stats
> > > system doesn't work on shared tables as I was expecting it too (as my
> > > latest patch requires it too :-). It treats instances of shared tables
> > > in separate databases as totally unique tables.  This makes it hard to
> > > know how much activity has really gone on for a shared table.
> > > 
> > > Is the behavior of the following example expected / desired?
> > 
> > I suspect is just a bug because no one noticed it before.  As I
> > understand it, the stats system is recorded per-database.  We could add
> > stuff so the global tables are only recorded in template1 or perhaps
> > record in template1 but report template1's numbers for all databases.
> 
> OK, well as we wait on the fix for the stats system, let me submit my
> patch for pg_autovacuum.  This patch assumes that the stats system will
> be fixed so that all inserts, updates and deletes performed on shared
> tables reguardless of what database those commands were executed from,
> will show up in the stats shown in each database.
> 
> Even if this the stats system isn't fixed, this patch still is much
> better about monitoring system tables that aren't shared, so it's an
> improvement no matter what.
> 
> Matthew T. O'Connor
> 
> 

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to