On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:08:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > That is all besides the point. If adding -f to the command line is for
> > some reason prohibitive, then the same applies to -e. That is all.
>
> Seems we should recommend -f rather than "<" for restores anyway, right?
Please keep in mind that it is not always possible to use -f. In my
case I had a file larger than 2GB and psql was compiled without large
file support. Detecting an error in that situation would have required
recompiling psql.
Also I don't see the point in not extending the context message of the
error. It's not like it's going to take too much processing power, nor
screen estate, so what is it?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a rumor that
you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise.
It's worth the effort. Recommended." (Gerry Pourwelle)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
