> -----Original Message----- (B> From: Tom Lane (B> (B> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: (B> > Tom Lane wrote: (B> >> You're not considering the possibility of a transient communication (B> >> failure. (B> (B> > Can't the master re-send the request after a timeout? (B> (B> Not "it can", but "it has to". (B (BWhy ?$B!!(BMainly the coordinator(slave) not the participant(master) (Bhas the resposibilty to resolve the in-doubt transaction. (B (Bregards, (BHiroshi Inoue (B (B (B---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- (BTIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (B (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Satoshi Nagayasu
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Satoshi Nagayasu
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Hans-Jürgen Schönig
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Jeff
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit Tom Lane