On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 08:36:36AM +0000, Jeff wrote:
>
> What do commercial databases do about 2PC or other multi-master solutions?
> You've done a good job of convincing me that it's unreliable no matter what
> (through your posts on this topic over a long time). However, I would think
> that something like Oracle or DB2 have some kind of answer for
> multi-master, and I'm curious what it is. If they don't, is it reasonable
> to make a test case that leaves their database inconsistent or hanging?
Most real replication systems are not doing 2PC. For me, 2PC-based
replication is not real interesting anyway, because the point of
multi-master replication is often at least partly speed, and 2PC is
nothing if not a good way to make sure that every database is at
least as slow as the slowest node.
But 2PC is important for application-server-based, XA-type work, and
for heterogenous databases. Both of those would be real nice
features to support.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
