Dave Page writes: > I find this a little worrying because if we want a feature or tweak for > pgAdmin we usually have to fight tooth & nail to justify getting it > committed (which is not a bad thing), however 'some guys at Red Hat' are > getting switches added to the postmaster without any discussion?
It was not a nice thing to do. Could whoever is responsible for this admin tool at Red Hat please specify exactly what data they need out of this interface, so we have a chance to make the interface a little more future-proof now and possibly remove some of the unneeded clutter that is giving translators problems? Surely that would be in everyone's interest, because if we're already set on changing the feature again pretty soon, it won't do that admin tool much good. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
