On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 18:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The GUC route sounds good. I'd like to see ctid handling beefed up at the > same time. For example, some operators such as != would be nice and might > ease the pain a little for people used to using oids as their "tuple id" :)
Are we encouraging the use of ctids by applications? -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly