Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 18:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The GUC route sounds good. I'd like to see ctid handling beefed up at the >> same time. For example, some operators such as != would be nice and might >> ease the pain a little for people used to using oids as their "tuple id" :)
> Are we encouraging the use of ctids by applications? I'd prefer to think not ... but they are a nice "out" in some situations. I suppose we could at least document them a little better. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings