I think he means that you can do this in oracle :

CREATE TABLE test (id NUMBER);

Oracle treats NUMBER as NUMBER(40) I think.
This seems to be an example of Oracle making up standards as they go along - do we want to copy this sort of thing ?


I usually just run a substitution of NUMBER(..) -> NUMERIC(..) and NUMBER -> INTEGER when transporting schemas from Oracle to Pg.
(This needs a little care - as NUMBER in Oracle has bigger scale than INTEGER in Pg)


regards

Mark




+ PostgreSQL does not support the NUMBER keyword without (...)
i.e. something in parenthesis following it.


Don't follow this one either. We don't have NUMBER --- are you speaking
of NUMERIC? If so, I'm not aware of any context where you're required
to put a precision on NUMERIC. Again, may we see an example?



Ditto.


Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html





---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
   (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to