Re: [HACKERS] more on initdb

[Andrew Dunstan]

Tom Lane wrote:

Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
 

I guess it ain't broke so it doesn't need 
to be fixed, so I'm not sure if it would be worth it.
   

That's about my feeling.  There's nothing wrong with the initdb process,
other than its dependency on shell scripting, and so no visible gain to
be had by reimplementing it further than replacing the shell script.
 

OK, I'm happy enough with that - just throwing out ideas.

cheers

andrew

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings