> Yes. I don't think that 2PC is a solution for robustness in face of > network failure. It's too slow, to begin with. Some sort of > multi-master system is very desirable for network failures, &c., but > I don't think anybody does active/hot standby with 2PC any more; the > performance is too bad.
I'm tired of this kind of "2PC is too slow" arguments. I think Satoshi, the only guy who made a trial implementation of 2PC for PostgreSQL, has already showed that 2PC is not that slow. -- Tatsuo Ishii ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
