Bruce Momjian wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
Christopher Browne wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (elein) writes:
>> What is the status of CVS head? Isn't it in sync with 7.4.RC2? I
>> just upgraded from CVS and rebuilt clean and initdb now gives this
>> lovely informative initdb failed message.
> > No, I believe that they have started applying 7.5 patches, notably
> including reimplementing initdb in C.
> > Jan checked in the ARC changes last night, and he and Tom ran into
> some problems, leading to that being pulled back out, while he
> revisits the code.


Yeah, there was a problem with *extreme* sharing ... the code tried to use the same buffer for multiple disk blocks at the same time, and somehow the backends did not agree on the correct content. But it's fixed and back in. You can see ARC working by setting

buffer_strategy_status_interval = 10 # seconds

and starting postmaster with -d1

It is not on by default?



Sure not. Why would someone turn on debug messages by default?


Or did you mean ARC itself? Since it replaced the old LRU code, it is the only choice you have now. Which sort of raises the question if we would want to have multiple choices, like a config option

buffer_replacement_strategy = lru|lru2|arc


Jan


--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #


---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to