Claudio Natoli wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Here's the situation as I see it: > > . there have been lots of requests for a native Win32 port > > . this is important to some people and not important to others > > . the decision has long ago been made to do it, and some work > > has been done, and more is being done > > > > Isn't it time to move on? > > No arguments here. As soon as the fork/exec changes are in place, count me > in!
It doesn't matter really --- I am working on the win32 port, and will make sure it is done and I will make sure it is done so it doesn't uglify our code. > Speaking of which, any ETA on this? Bruce? If anyone from core can indicate > how they'd like this architected (from the perspective of code > rearrangement), I'm willing to have a crack at this. http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]