Tom, > In general I am suspicious of proposals to rewrite queries into UNION > "equivalents", because the "equivalent" usually isn't exactly > equivalent, at least not without conditions that the planner can't > easily prove.
As I said, I'm not sure that UNIONing the query is the solution, we just need something other than what the planner currently does, which does not complete. Explains later today. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
