On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > The only problem with removing HISTORY from CVS is that we will not have > an easily reable list of release changes _until_ we package the release. > Perhaps we should keep HISTORY in CVS, but regenerate it on tarball > packaging, and INSTALL too.
Confused here, but how "up to date" is HISTORY in CVS to start with? I don't go out of my way to watch for them, but commits to HISTORY don't seem to be all that often to start with ... and how many ppl actually look at the HISTORY file *except* at release time? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
