On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:17:32PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > The only problem with removing HISTORY from CVS is that we will not have
> > > an easily reable list of release changes _until_ we package the release.
> > > Perhaps we should keep HISTORY in CVS, but regenerate it on tarball
> > > packaging, and INSTALL too.
> >
> > What about having them generated from some Make target, so the curious
> > user could generate it on his own, and is also built by Marc's
> > ficticious package-prep target?
>
> He would have to have the SGML tools installed, and that isn't
> trivial/likely.

True, but Peter could very easily have HISTORY generated and on the web
page as part of his docs build process ... then 'HISTORY' in CVS would
just be a URL to that online version, while 'HISTORY' in a release would
be the full HISTORY file ... ?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to