Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > Thinking more about it, I'm not sure if it really is an important > addition at all. I've got a number of requests for the feature. so > there are people that want it, that much I know.
I like it very much, and I think mostly everyone else does, too. It's just a question of what syntax to use. Personally, I would be OK with "=>". The SQL standard already attaches a special meaning to "->" (object dereference, like in C), so I'd just avoid all "arrows" as operator names. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
