On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > just a question of what syntax to use. Personally, I would be OK with > "=>".
That's also what I'm leaning towards now. As Greg suggested, just making => a special case as a function parameter. And if one want's to call a function with an expression containing a => one have to write foo((x=>23)) and not foo(x=>23). That's the current plan I have, I think it's implementable in a not so ugly way. If that works out the symbol is not stolen, I would just borrow it a little when it's the top level of an expression in a function call position. -- /Dennis Björklund ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
