Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Those two cases are not hard, because in those scenarios the parser
>> knows it is expecting a type specification. The real problem is this
>> syntax for typed literals:
>> typename 'string'
> Just disallow that particular case for custom types :P
Well, maybe we could --- comments? Tom Lockhart went to some lengths to
support that, but now that he's gafiated we could perhaps rethink it.
AFAICS the SQL spec only requires this syntax for certain built-in types.
Tom wanted to generalize that to all datatypes that Postgres supports,
and that seems like a reasonable goal ... but if it prevents getting to
other reasonable goals then we ought to think twice.
> Will this work: 'string'::typename
Yes, since the :: cues the parser to expect a typename next.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
