"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ahh, that's not quite what I thought you meant. It sounded like you were
> questioning the reliability of PostgreSQL, not it's ability to be
> recovered to point of failure.

I think the waters got muddied a bit by the suggestion elsewhere in the
thread (not from Nicolai, IIRC) that we needed a mailing list to talk
about reliability issues in general.  We know we need PITR to help us
become a more credible enterprise-grade database; so that discussion is
short and sweet.  What people were confused about was whether there was
enough other issues to need ongoing discussion.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to