"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ahh, that's not quite what I thought you meant. It sounded like you were > questioning the reliability of PostgreSQL, not it's ability to be > recovered to point of failure.
I think the waters got muddied a bit by the suggestion elsewhere in the thread (not from Nicolai, IIRC) that we needed a mailing list to talk about reliability issues in general. We know we need PITR to help us become a more credible enterprise-grade database; so that discussion is short and sweet. What people were confused about was whether there was enough other issues to need ongoing discussion. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly