"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> which might not be for every statement. Savepoints that you don't
>> actually need are going to be a fairly expensive overhead, AFAICS.
> Well with other db's per statement rollback is a no overhead feature,
> so this is pg specific.
I very much doubt that. We are not expending any disk I/O to do
rollback, which is not true in (say) Oracle. I'm concerned about the
internal bookkeeping overhead.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
