Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >Sure you sure? I didn't think you would get a tag on a syntax error, so > >no log would print, which I think is OK. > > > > > > > If people are happy with suppressing statement logging on a parse error, > OK. For the remainder I would just defer the logging till immediately > after the parse and get the tags for the statements - and suppress > logging the query string if they were all SELECT or all > SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE|COPY according to the setting.
Good. My feeling is that if there is a parse error, we can't be sure what type of query was sent, and it isn't going to be executed anyway because it threw an error. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
