Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > No, I agree that that would be foolish ... but there has also been alot > > > > > done on the code over the past few months that even *one* of those > > > > > features should be enough to put it over the top ... > > > > > > > > OK, what is the plan for feature freeze? > > > > > > > > As we going for June 1, and making no adjustments? If we have no major > > > > features done, we still do June 1. Or are we waiting for one or several > > > > major features to complete and then set a freeze date? > > > > > > 1 of the major features that are currently on tap (ie. Win32) *or* June > > > 1st, whichever happens to be the longer of the two ... > > > > > > Indications that I've seen through this discussion are that Win32 can, and > > > should, be done by June 1st ...so extending may be a moot point anyway ... > > > > OK, but I am worried about giving Win32 special treatment, and having > > the date float like that until Win32 is done. This is what we did with > > the SMP fixed in 7.3 and the date slipped week by week. We have to set > > the date firm early on. I think we all agreed to that in the past. > > No no ... the date isn't floating on Win32 ... the date is floating on one > of the major features (PITR, 2PC, etc) ... if Win32 happens to be the > first major feature, so be it, but it is not contigent on Win32 ...
So you are floating the entire thing. I am tired of discussing this. You call the freeze and when it is a disaster, you can take the credit. I am not worrying about any freeze date anymore. You freeze whenever you want to. Floating a freeze data has always been a failure. Let's watch it happen again. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
