Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


What can be done?  Well, money from Fujitsu and other companies
(Afilias/Sloney, Command Prompt/ecpg-plPHP), is allowing us to hit
some of these bigger items, so hopefully that will move us forward
in these complex areas. I am not sure what could have been done to
push some of these projects along faster.

Perhaps some more public cajoling of the masses into helping out
would be good. Not just development but testing. Occasional posts on
general asking people to help test Win32 and PITR for example, or a
prominent link on the main page asking people to try out the latest
Win32. It may not be "beta-ready" yet, but it surely could not hurt
to have people start testing as soon as possible.

I'm one of those that should probably be testing early. As it stands, I'm subscribed to -hackers and if I downloaded a snapshot from today I still don't know what it is I'd be testing.


How about a series of mini-releases (say) every 8 weeks - 7 weeks patching, 1 week stabilising. That would provide something solid enough to do some development work with, but you're not going to cry if (e.g.) nested transactions didn't work with system tables.

Is that a plausible situation, or madness from a developer-resources point of view?

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
     joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to