Robert Treat wrote: > On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 12:55, Josh Berkus wrote: > > Tom, > > > > > The main downside of testing a snapshot, as I see it, is that the > > > snapshot is virtually certain not to be initdb-compatible with either > > > the previous release or the upcoming one. Mini-releases would have > > > that problem too, and so I don't really see what they add in terms of > > > testability. > > > > The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more accessable to > > newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating. > > > > FWIW we already do nightly tarballs that people can use to build from if > they want... > > What might be handy is an alpha build of the win32 version once the > folks developing it feel it's stable enough to merit such a thing...
The Win32 project page already has nightly Win32 builds courtesy of Magnus. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
