Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:39:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> END doesn't so directly imply that you are trying to commit a failed
>> transaction.
> The problem with END is how about executing it inside a PL/pgSQL
> function. Can we distinguish it from plpgsql's END?
We're going to have to deal with that on the BEGIN side anyway.
A reasonable possibility would be to require the TRANSACTION word
to appear when you do it in plpgsql.
> Also, COMMITing an aborted main transaction is the same as ENDing it;
> and in fact, it's the same as ROLLBACK. Why is it more confusing for a
> subtransaction to behave the same?
But the point here is that the behavior would *not* be the same.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
