[ Thread moved to hackers and win32.]
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Agreed. My pthread book says pthread_mutex_init() should be called only
> >once, and we have to guarantee that. If the Windows implentation allows
> >it to be called multiple times, just create a function to be called only
> >by Win32 that does that and leave the Unix safe.
> >
> >
> >
> Ok, so here's the win32 workaround with the unix stuff left untouched.
> There's no memory interlocking api in win32 that wouldn't need some
> initializing api call itself, so we'd have to go for assembly level
> test-and-set code or introduce a mandatory global libpq initializing
> api. Considering the probably quite low usage of kerberos/ssl together
> with threads under win32, and the very low probability of two
> threads/processors (!) trying to initiate a connection at the same time,
> it doesn't seem to be worth the compiler hassle with assembly inline.
What is the recommended way to create mutex objects (CreateMutex) from
Win32 libraries? There must be a clean way like there is in pthreads.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the patch Win32, pthread_mutex_init() == CreateMutex():
+#ifndef WIN32
static pthread_mutex_t singlethread_lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
+#else
+ static pthread_mutex_t singlethread_lock;
+ static int mutex_initialized = 0;
+ if (!mutex_initialized)
+ {
+ mutex_initialized = 1;
+ pthread_mutex_init(&singlethread_lock, NULL);
+ }
+#endif
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
