Tom Lane wrote:
I'll repeat what I said in response to your other posting:
Hm? I never posted something with shared mem usage before, what do you mean?
This uses a shared memory area with no lock, which seems a bad design;
AFAICS there should be no lock necessary.
We agreed long ago that theI understand that, so what's the suggested way to store data common for all backends?
postmaster should never depend on the correctness of any shared memory
data structure; but this patch would make it do so.
Regards, Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
