Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried adding the extra scan in and it as all well and good up until
> the second where I realised that the TocEntry struct has no field that
> allows me to know the correct way of finding the full descriptor of each
> object.
Ugh. Definitely an oversight. Don't suppose you want to think about
pulling the name out of the DROP command ;-) ?
> I'm running out of time unfortunately, and I need to know from you
> whether I should go back to my work on making owner and acl TOC entries
> fully independent? All this means is that people restoring pre-7.5
> binary dumps into 7.5 will not get the owner fixes... But people using
> the binary format to upgrade seems like a pretty rare case to me!
Hardly --- for instance, people using large objects have no other
choice.
You can *not* change pg_restore in a way that will make it impossible
for such people to restore their dumps (and no, I don't think it will
fly to tell someone after the fact they should have used 7.5 pg_dump...)
Maybe it's sufficient to have a backwards-compatibility mode in which
the SET SESSION AUTH commands still get issued same-as-ever. In fact,
you could just automatically do that if you see the archive version is
too old to have ALTER OWNER support.
On the whole though, I think editing the DROP commands might be the best
way. Are there any cases where that would actually not work?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
