On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 22:30:05 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Well, if we add them (and they would be very useful I reckon) should we > >>ensure there's an obvious PG naming thing happening? > > Why are they useful???? If you want PG specific stuff then use the PG > specific catalogs!!!
The information schema could be used to provide a more stable interface. The pg catalog changes from release to release and it would be nice to be able to write code which is more future proof. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend