Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > An 'END SUB' after a 'BEGIN SUB' in plpgsql could be required, and could > > mean start/end block and subtx. I do not really see a downside. > > But, it would imho only make sense if the 'END SUB' would commit sub > > or abort sub iff subtx is in aborted state (see my prev posting) > > > > Andreas > > > Hello, > > is good idea use keywords "begin sub" and "end sub"? Programmers like me > will be an problems with reading and writing SP, because begin sub and > mostly end sub are keywords from visual basic with different sense. > BEGIN SUBTRANSACTION and END SUBTRANSACTION is longer but more readable
I think we agreed on BEGIN NESTED/COMMIT NESTED, and START NESTED TRANSACTION and COMMIT NESTED TRANSACTION. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
