On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Stephen Frost wrote: Hi,
> > why is this? This is very limiting ... > > It's 2TB... Yeah, you're right. I didn't take into account, that you multiply it with 1kb - my fault. 2TB is enough - at the moment at least. But implementing it in 64 from now on could save a lot of work in the future ... > It sounded to me like it might be a limitation forced by some other part > of postgres, but I don't really know... Good question though. I'm not sure about it either - anyone? Greetings, Klaus -- Full Name : Klaus Naumann | (http://www.mgnet.de/) (Germany) Phone / FAX : ++49/177/7862964 | E-Mail: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
