Stephen Frost wrote:
* Rod Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 11:47, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Klaus Naumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
3. The maximum quota size is (currently) the maximum of int4*1024 bytes.
why is this? This is very limiting ...
It's 2TB...
Okay.. that is good for a few years. What do we do after 2007?
I was pointing out that it's not all *that* limiting. If it's not too difficult (ie: isn't something that affects disk layout or internal postgres things..) I certainly don't have a problem w/ moving to a 64bit int.
Stephen
My thinking was, if you're allowing a user to use that much space, they're probably better off with an unlimited quota... unless you don't vacuum often and there are heavy updates/deletes performed on that user's relations.
Internally there isn't a problem (as I see it) with using a bigger data type.
-- Jonah H. Harris, UNIX Administrator | phone: 505.224.4814 Albuquerque TVI | fax: 505.224.3014 525 Buena Vista SE | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 | http://w3.tvi.edu/~jharris/
"All great truths begin as blasphemies." -- George Bernard Shaw
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])