Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:57:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've been thinking about what to do with cursors in subtransactions.
> So within this proposal, a query executed by normal means will get its
> resources saved in the transaction ResourceOwner?
No, *all* queries are executed within portals. The reason we need a
transaction ResourceOwner is because query parsing/planning happens in
advance of creating the portal, so we need someplace to keep track of
resources acquired during that process.
> How is the "unnamed portal" affected by it?
Same as the rest.
I don't recall whether SPI creates actual portals, but we'd definitely
want it to create a new ResourceOwner for queries it runs.
> On the other hand, some people supported the idea that v3 Bind portals
> should behave nontransactionally, while DECLARE portals should behave
> transactionally. Maybe we could make that a property of the portal, or
> even a user-selectable property (where we would define a reasonable
> default behavior).
This is certainly possible. Whether it's a good idea needs further
discussion...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
