Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 23:18, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: > > Thanks for the vote of confidence, on or off list. > > > too many people spend a lot of > > money for proprietary databases, just for some missing features in > > PostgreSQL > > Agreed - PITR isn't aimed at existing users of PostgreSQL. If you use it > already, even though it doesn't have it, then you are quite likely to be > able to keep going without it. > > Most commercial users won't touch anything that doesn't have PITR.
Agreed. I am surprised at how few requests we have gotten for PITR. I assume people are either using replication or not considering us. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
