Couldn't agree more. Maybe we should have made more noise :-)
Glen Parker wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 23:18, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Thanks for the vote of confidence, on or off list.
too many people spend a lot of
money for proprietary databases, just for some missing features in
PostgreSQL
Agreed - PITR isn't aimed at existing users of PostgreSQL. If you use it
already, even though it doesn't have it, then you are quite likely to be
able to keep going without it.
Most commercial users won't touch anything that doesn't have PITR.
Agreed. I am surprised at how few requests we have gotten for PITR. I
assume people are either using replication or not considering us.
Don't forget that there are (must be) lots of us that know it's coming and
are just waiting until it's available. I haven't requested per se, but
believe me, I'm waiting for it :-)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
