That makes it sound as if you didn't do the same level
of testing on *this* release, like it didn't go
through all the tests or something.  

How about "it does not have the extensive testing
history that other supported platforms in this release
have."

Later
Rob
> 
> OK, new wording:
> 
>         Because Win32 is significantly different
> from the Unix platforms
>         supported in previous releases, it has not
> been tested as
>         extensively as other supported platforms in
> this release. Please
>         test it thoroughly before using it in
> production.
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Richard Huxton wrote:
> > 
> > > "lacks the extended testing"?
> > 
> > That's good. We don't need to focus on bugs. The
> word bug and postgresql 
> > should never occur in the same sentence... hmm...
> > 
> > -- 
> > /Dennis Bj?rklund
> > 
> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian                        | 
> http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610)
> 359-1001
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts
> Road
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown
> Square, Pennsylvania 19073
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
> 



                
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Reply via email to