John Hansen wrote: > > > > I ran some tests last week and can report results similar on Tom's test: > > > > > > > > pgbench -i -s 10 bench > > > > pgbench -c 10 -t 10000 bench > > > > > > don't you have to specify the scaling factor for the benchmark as well? > as in pgbench -c 10 -t 10000 -s 10 bench ? > > > I just tried and got 115tps with fsync off vs 100 with fsync on, so > > fsync is certainly doing something. > > well, I usually get results that differ by that much from run to run. > Probably you ran in to more checkpoints on the second test. > > Also, did you reinitialize the bench database with pgbench -i ?
I destroyed the database and recreated it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
