On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:08:20PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Maybe we should have a pgfoundry project where all translations > > > were kept, and from which the main CVS could be updated > > > semi-automatically. Then we wouldn't have Peter checking out and > > > committing all the time. > > > > That sounds like a fine idea. My only concern would be the > > "not-maintained-here" syndrome, which occurs every time some CVS tree > > contains a file that is actually maintained by an external group, > > thus blocking the maintainers of the former CVS tree from applying > > necessary fixes at times. Nevertheless, I think this is a winner. > > Let's consider it when we start the 8.1 cycle. > > OK, is anyone opposed to this idea? I would register a pgfoundry > project (name suggestions? "translations"?), give most established > translators commit access, and move the statistics pages there.
Sounds good. Maybe the name is too generic; what about "server translations", or something like that? -- Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) "¿Cómo puedes confiar en algo que pagas y que no ves, y no confiar en algo que te dan y te lo muestran?" (Germán Poo) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
