Dave Page wrote: > > 2. Another question is what to do with 8.0.X? Do we > > backpatch this for > > Win32 performance? Can we test it enough to know it will work well? > > 8.0.2 is going to have a more rigorous testing cycle because of the > > buffer manager changes. > > This question was asked earlier, and iirc, a few people said yes, and > no-one said no. I'm most definitely in the yes camp.
I have backpatched O_SYNC for Win32 to 8.0.X. Everyone seems to agree it should be supported by wal_sync_method. --- the "default" issue still needs discussion. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster