"John Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Look at the upper/lower I sent to the list, they should be able to > replace upper/lower for the utf8 encoding.... (and works independent of > locale)..
I was under the impression we couldn't use these, precisely because they weren't locale-aware. ("It works for most people" isn't good enough.) In any case, don't we need a solution that covers sorting (strcoll) as well as upper/lower? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster