Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > > Do companies want to write for Blue Hat PostgreSQL and Suza PostgreSQL > > because that might be what happens if we don't stay organized? In fact, > > it might have be happening already. > > Well that depends... If the companies are writing for Pervasive > PostgreSQL I don't think they would have a problem with that ;). > > And I do agree with you Bruce, it is happening already -- I don't think > there is any question in that.
Oh, well good I am not seeing phantoms. I have had time to focus on where we are for the past few days and I am worried about what I see. It can be great, or it can be a mess, for both us and the companies involved, and I want to work to make it the former. The fact is, we now have more and more companies relying on us to be a success, and that is an added responsibility for us. We can make it work, but just hoping for it isn't enough --- we have to focus on the issues early and plan for that success. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
