Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not convinced that Postgres ought to provide
>> a way to second-guess the TCP stack ...
> Would you be ok with a patch that allowed configuration of the
> TCP_KEEPCNT / TCP_KEEPIDLE / TCP_KEEPINTVL socket options on backend
> sockets?
[ shrug... ] As long as it doesn't fail to build on platforms that
don't offer those options, I couldn't complain too hard. But do we
really need all that?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
