Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
I think the idea is that plphp would be in our CVS, but would not be
shipped as part of the main tarball, rather as its own separate tarball.
That is what I'm hoping for ... if it can be shipped as a seperate
tarball, my arguments *against* including it become moot, since
packagers (and ports) can have a nice small, quick to download package
instead of having to re-download a >11MB file each time ...
I don't mind if its *also* ship'd in the main distribution as well, I
just want that 'quick to download since I already have the
libraries/headers installed' package ...
Any other PL's not currently in your CVS that you might consider to
bring in while you're at it?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match