Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Yes, actually. If you look at the discussion, this is what killed the 2001
> proposal; packages were proposed as orthagonal to schema which was not
> acceptable.
I think what actually killed that proposal was that it was not made
clear what it did that wouldn't be done as well (and in a more standard
fashion) by providing schemas.
What I read in this thread is that the only truly missing feature is
package variables (ie, session-local variables); is that an accurate
statement? If so, it would seem simplest to add such a feature to
plpgsql and be done with it. Several people already pointed out that
most of the other PLs support that feature today.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
