Tom Lane wrote:
One argument against this is that it'd mean another copy of the system catalogs in a standard installation. That's been running three to five megabytes over the last few releases. Disk space is pretty cheap these days, but we do get occasional complaints from people who wish the footprint was smaller.
In this case, a dba would drop anything not neccessary, including INFORMATION_SCHEMA. We also could provide an initdb switch to omit that pg_system db (and more non-vital stuff).
I particularly dislike the name "default" for that database, because we'd have to expect users to place their user data there regularly (as in the public schema), which is just what should *not* happen. So the pg_ prefix should be used, the docs say clearly enough "don't touch pg_% objects unless you know exactly what you do".
Regards, Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly