Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 July 2005 20:01
To: Dave Page
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
This patch looks good. The only question I have is why you
didn't want
the pgport rename/unlink calls?
Because I wanted the standard platform behaviour of both. For backend
storage subsystem purposes, it's certainly necessary to emulate *ix
behaviour of deleting a file in use, but for generic file access IMHO
the generic behaviour should be exposed.
Please note that there's some rollback logic in pg_file_rename that
might break when using the pg_xxx calls.
Regards,
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
