Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > XHTML is simply a minimal reformulation of HTML in XML, and even > > uses the HTML 4.01 definitions for its semantics. Given that, it's > > hard to see why it should be considered a bad thing. > > Here is the article: > http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
While I believe that the reasoning in the article is totally bogus, the article only talks about which MIME type should be used for XHTML, not about whether the format should be used. Note that if you support the conclusion of the article, you may find the entire PostgreSQL web site objectionable. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
