* Greg Stark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > However I was under the impression that 2.6 had moved beyond that problem. > It would be very interesting to know if 2.6 still suffers from this.
The tests on the em64t at my place were using 2.6.12. I had thought 2.6
was better about this too, but I don't have another explanation for it.
CONFIG_SMT was enabled, etc..
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
